| Ticket UUID: | 72f4c637d0ad221fa43d5f1a73835281868e6472 | |||
| Title: | Native aarch64 build for M1 Macs, Surface Pro X and other new devices? | |||
| Status: | Open | Type: | Feature_Request | |
| Severity: | Minor | Priority: | Low | |
| Subsystem: | General | Resolution: | Open | |
| Last Modified: | 2021-08-10 12:36:44 | |||
| Version Found In: | 0.4.28 | |||
|
apw54325 — 2021-01-07 16:53:40 Title says it all, last ticket on this is from 2018 so I thought it would be fair to post this. Now that Apple and Microsoft are full out making ARM devices and SBCs like the Raspberry Pi are becoming more powerful and more popular for cheap desktops, there should be a native ARM build of Ripcord to run on them. | ||||
|
cancel — 2021-01-08 20:45:49 Yeah. It should work OK on M1 Macs already, with Rosetta 2. The Windows one will be harder, because I don't have one and don't have any way to test it, really. | ||||
|
ccallahan — 2021-03-30 07:44:28 Just following up, Ripcord works very well on Win10 Pro aarch64 (build 21343). In fact, regular Discord is completely unusable on it or stable Win10 aarch64. Also, if you are interested in compiling builds for Apple Silicon and Win10 aarch64 I have access to both pieces of hardware. Feel free to ping me and we can figure something out. | ||||
|
molzy — 2021-06-02 15:30:37 I would be interested in a Linux aarch64 build whenever these are looked at. Happy to test builds on a Pinebook Pro. | ||||
|
fbastiat — 2021-08-10 12:36:44 Also came here to request this. As of now, it works fine with Rosetta, but takes up significantly more resources (compared to an intel mac). Since one of the main advantages of Ripcord is its low resource footprint, I think an ARM build still makes sense. I'm happy to test any M1 builds as well when/if you get around to it. All the best | ||||